« New paper: The elusiveness of doxastic compatibilism | Main | New paper: How to be an internalist without direct, simultaneous access to justifiers »
June 05, 2009
New paper: How We Choose our Beliefs
by Gregory Salmieri (primary author, UNC/Chapel Hill)
and Benjamin Bayer (secondary author, Colorado College)
(June 5, 2009) (DOC) (PDF)
Recent years have seen increasing attacks on the "deontological" conception (or as we call it, the "prescriptive conception") of epistemic justification, the view that epistemology guides us in forming beliefs responsibly. Critics challenge an important presupposition of the prescriptive conception, doxastic voluntarism, the view that we choose our beliefs. We assume that epistemic prescriptions are indispensable, and seek to answer objections to doxastic voluntarism, most prominently William Alston's. We contend that Alston falsely assumes that choice of belief requires the assent to a specific propositional content. We argue that beliefs can be chosen under descriptions which do not specify their propositional content, and that these descriptions—which concern the method of inquiry whereby a belief is to be formed—nonetheless specify the features of the belief that make it epistemically responsible to adopt. More generally, we urge that the identity of a belief is not exhausted by its content.
Posted by Ben at June 5, 2009 06:36 PM